Always the innovators, never the torchbearers: England's fate gets written in the clouds instead of stars

Asking the general population a vague description of the Caribbean is more likely to draw out adjectives like sunny, relaxing, and vibrant. However, for the England team, it was gloomy, stressful, and surprisingly cloudy.

There's no validity or sense to the hypothesis that clouds hold grudges or attachments, but one cannot help but feel that they followed England throughout their World Cup journey. They were there when their first match against Scotland in Barbados was washed out (maybe for the better or worse), and again, during their crunch near-knockout game against Namibia, where they had to practically beg the clouds to go away to avoid an early elimination.

Clouds threatened to render England helpless when they congregated at the Providence Stadium in Guyana, following them all the way from the Caribbean to the north tip of South America. Thankfully, they stayed away for the most part, giving England a fair shot at attempting to qualify for the finals as opposed to a meek surrender.

However, the end result for Jos Buttler and Co. turned out to be something worse than a meek surrender as they felt India's wrath under the beating sun in the second semi-final of the 2024 T20 World Cup.

England's Last Dance turned from title defense to a bare minimum deed

For the sake of trivia, England can state that they played the semi-finals of the 2024 T20 World Cup, but can they say that proudly? A campaign that included tame defeats to arch-rivals Australia, South Africa, and India overwhelmingly overshadowed their efforts against the West Indies, Oman, and Namibia.

To sum it up, their campaign ended up being a gift-wrapped stone. Pretty and flashy from the outside in the form of the semi-final finish, but messed up and rugged on the inside upon examination.

England were not immune to issues during the lead-up to the World Cup, and there was a general expectation that things would gel in the tournament environment.

They had to rejig their bowling attack for the sake of batting depth, Bairstow in the middle order was a hit-and-miss, and they were always strangers in the Caribbean to a degree, despite their connection to Barbados. Day by day as the campaign progressed, England's sheen as the defending champions kept fading away.

The weak grip they had on the Caribbean conditions was evident when England skipper Jos Buttler opted to bowl first, primarily due to the rain threat. India skipper Rohit Sharma admitted he would have done the opposite, in spite of the rain threat. The clouds betrayed England as rain did not play a major part in the proceedings, and only one captain was proven right at the end of the day.

England have generally preferred to chase throughout the tournament, but attempting to do so on a tacky surface against three Indian spinners was no less than a suicide mission.

Spin was touted to play a huge role in Guyana, and it inevitably did. The three Indian spinners accounted for 58 runs off 11 overs with six wickets among them. The English spinners did a commendable job too, giving away 49 runs in eight overs with a wicket, but with only two options. Buttler, in what he now admits was a tactical mistake, did not give Moeen Ali a single over.

With two right-handed batters in Rohit Sharma and Suryakumar Yadav dominating the middle overs, the right-arm off-spinner could not find an avenue to get himself introduced. On the flipside, England's right-handed dominant batting unit were entirely trapped by India's left-arm spin trio.

With the ball, England had a grip over India, but did not have them on a leash. The Men in Blue were able to take advantage of the slight wriggle room to scratch and claw towards the 170-run mark.

The run chase summed up the match for England in more ways than one. Buttler perishing to the very first ball against spin while attempting to play a reverse sweep, Phil Salt being ousted by a Bumrah off-cutter, Bairstow's duck, Livingstone and Archer's mix-up, were all nails that England hammered on their own coffin, with a little helping hand from India, who were only too happy to oblige.

England forced to face a familiar feeling with shades of grim reality and acceptance

There is no scientific study to suggest that watching sports or following a team alters human physiology by any means (even though the grey hair and dark circles suggest otherwise), but English fans have developed a defense mechanism of sorts that allows them to sense doom before it hits.

This is primarily because of the exposure to the team's repeated fall from grace, so much so that, it blends with normalcy now, but not so much that they are immune or ignorant to it.

Whether it be the heartbreaking losses in the 2015 ODI World Cup, 2016 T20 World Cup final or the unexpected 2017 Champions Trophy semi-final, or the 2021 T20 World Cup semi-final bottle job, England have seen it all. To their credit, they have gone on to grow and slay their demons since then, but they have not buried it.

They are not strangers to being close to a title and watching it slip or get snatched from their hands. But despite winning both the white-ball titles in the recent past, there is a feeling that England's revolution, spurred on by Eoin Morgan after the 2015 ODI World Cup humiliation, has arguably underachieved. Perhaps not in terms of making a statement or changing the approach, but in terms of silverware, much like the famous Real Madrid galacticos in the early 2000s.

Yes, you cannot win them all (someone tell that to Australia), but the nature of their exits from the 2023 ODI World Cup and the 2024 T20 World Cup paints the same story. England's aversion to subcontinent-type conditions may have played a part, but adapting is a hallmark of a champion side.

Why are England good at evolving but not sustaining?

A couple of weeks ago, former England captain Michael Vaughan's column for the Telegraph had an interesting take on English cricket. It largely concerned the nation's inability to sustain success and forge a dynasty despite being trendsetters.

"We never sustain success for long in English cricket. We have a couple of good years, win the odd trophy or big series and think we have made it only for everyone else to catch up and overtake," Vaughan wrote.

"It is the story of English cricket. It makes them interesting to watch because you never know what you are going to get but for once it would be nice to learn from Australia. I don’t like praising them, but they just turn it on at World Cups and bad series or tournaments are just blips between successes. It is the other way around for England," Vaughan add.ed

Despite an Englishman's innate fondness to argue, they may not have much to counter the aforementioned truthbomb. It is hard to pinpoint from the outside as to what is stopping English cricket from building a legacy. Is it complacency, an inability to master their own game, rough transitions, lack of leaders in the side?

There might not be a single obvious answer to this issue, and unfortunately for England, the whole is definitely greater than the sum of the above-mentioned parts.

England are placed bang in the middle at the moment after successive disappointing World Cups. It can be a dangerous place to be, considering how far they can fall from here given the problems they now face. An aging side calls for a transition, the futures of the captain-coach duo of Buttler and Mott are uncertain too, among other issues.

As far as the positives are concerned, England may struggle to view the silver linings in the dense clouds that are bound to follow them home.