5 most important character arcs Game of Thrones failed to redeem

Game of Thrones earned its reputation for its slow-moving, complex, and morally ambiguous character narratives. Unlike conventional fantasy, characters changed not because the narrative needed them to, but because their decisions forced them to, sometimes for the worse, sometimes toward redemption that was hard-won.

But in the final seasons 7 and 8 of Game of Thrones, racing to an end, many of those painstakingly built arcs were either rushed, reversed, or outright abandoned. What once felt like intentional, tragic storytelling now felt like shortcuts to narrative, with multiple key characters getting robbed of the redemption or reckoning that we were told they deserved.

Here are the five most significant character arcs that Game of Thrones never redeemed.

Disclaimer: This article contains the writer's opinion. Readers’ discretion is advised

---

5 most important character arcs Game of Thrones failed to redeem

Daenerys Targaryen

Daenerys' turn to tyranny is one of the series' most divisive choices. Previous installments portrayed her increasing hunger for power and blind idealism, hinting that a tragedy could be in store, but it would take time and reflection.

Instead, her transformation into the proverbial “Mad Queen” unfolds over the course of several episodes. It is not the destination that was the problem. Like her entire moral collapse, it did not contain enough interior struggle or consequences to back up years of character development, and took away the tragic necessity of her arc.

---

Jaime Lannister

Once, Jaime’s story arc was one of the most engaging on the show. He was the discredited knight who was gradually regaining his humanity through love, guilt, and insight. His bond with Brienne represented real growth away from the toxic influence of Cersei.

But in a final choice to return to Cersei, portrayed as inevitability rather than tragedy, that progress was undone. The series portrayed his character arc reaching a romantic destiny rather than a moral failing, depriving the audience of the emotional payoff that his redemption arc promised.

---

Jon Snow

Jon Snow’s transformation from bastard outsider to reluctant leader was a result of honor, sacrifice, and wisdom won through hard experiences. But once his real parentage was exposed, the show never really interrogated what that meant on a psychological or political level.

Rather than defining Jon’s identity, the revelation renders him a reactive, passive subject to the will of others. His fate was left to others; he is an exile, but this transformation seemed less like poetic tragedy and more like narrative evasion.

---

Cersei Lannister

Cersei’s arc wasn’t going to make her redeemable, but it had to have a narrative consequence. She was a paranoid, brutal ruler in earlier seasons, driven to cruelty by fear and loss, which made her downfall one brought about by her own decisions.

But she hardly changes at all in the final seasons, demoted during major battles and ultimately perishing without real confrontation. Her downfall didn’t have the thematic gravity her villainy had deserved.

---

Bran Stark

Bran’s evolution into the Three-Eyed Raven in Game of Thrones would be a complete reimagining of power, memory, and leadership. Still, the show never really established what he could do, what he is motivated by, or how much he can do, which means that his ascendancy feels random.

By depriving Bran of emotional autonomy, while at the same time bestowing him with ultimate power, the plot doesn’t explain why his journey ends in kingship, confusing rather than enlightening the audience.

Ultimately, Game of Thrones didn’t collapse for embracing tragedy, but for shrinking the meticulous storytelling. These loose ends serve as a reminder that, when it comes to long-form storytelling, endings matter as much as beginnings.

---

Follow Soap Central for more.